<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: English: The Official Language&#8230; in school?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chipanglish.com/education/english_only_school/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chipanglish.com/education/english_only_school/</link>
	<description>Blogging semi-coherently in Chinese, Japanese, and English</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:14:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elenita</title>
		<link>http://www.chipanglish.com/education/english_only_school/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Elenita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipanglish.com/?p=259#comment-56</guid>
		<description>This is deserving of its own post, but I wonder how a hypothetical deaf student might have changed things in said classroom. I know a lot of hearing people consider ASL an adaptation or &quot;translation&quot; of English, but the consensus in the deaf community is that ASL is its own language. If there had been a deaf student, would he/she have insisted on his/her right to not use English in the classroom? Or would the teacher have insisted such a student leave and not be able to participate for the sake of language purity? Ugh.

At least we have some hope: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/23/us/23english.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nashville voters recently rejected an English-only measure&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is deserving of its own post, but I wonder how a hypothetical deaf student might have changed things in said classroom. I know a lot of hearing people consider ASL an adaptation or &#8220;translation&#8221; of English, but the consensus in the deaf community is that ASL is its own language. If there had been a deaf student, would he/she have insisted on his/her right to not use English in the classroom? Or would the teacher have insisted such a student leave and not be able to participate for the sake of language purity? Ugh.</p>
<p>At least we have some hope: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/23/us/23english.html" rel="nofollow">Nashville voters recently rejected an English-only measure</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
